Grammar Compliance Audit
Date: 2026-01-20
Auditor: Claude Code (Haiku)
Issue: #404 MUX-VISION-GRAMMAR-CORE
Phase: 1 (Feature Grammar Audit)
Executive Summary
This audit surveys 16 major Piper Morgan features and systems to assess their compliance with the Entity/Moment/Place/Lenses/Situation grammar model (formalized in ADR-055 and MUX infrastructure).
Key Finding: Grammar compliance varies widely across the system. Morning Standup demonstrates full consciousness, while most features exhibit flattened or partial compliance. This creates an opportunity to systematically uplift features through a prioritized transformation roadmap.
Compliance Distribution:
- Conscious (fully compliant): 1 feature
- Partial (some elements present): 6 features
- Flattened (mechanical/database language): 9 features
Audit Methodology
For each feature, we evaluate five grammar elements:
| Element |
Definition |
Pass Criteria |
| Entity |
Actors (user, Piper, integrations) tracked with identity persistence |
User/Piper identity preserved throughout flow; self-reference preserved |
| Moment |
Discrete occurrences framed as scenes, not timestamps |
More than temporal markers; narrative/experiential language present |
| Place |
Context and atmosphere acknowledged; not just config strings |
Integration/location-specific behavior; “where” affects “how” |
| Lenses |
Perceptual dimensions applied (8D spatial, temporal, relational) |
At least one lens applicable; multiple lenses preferred |
| Situation |
Dramatic tension or context beyond raw data |
Conditional behavior based on state; appropriate responses to circumstances |
Compliance Levels:
- Conscious ✅: All 5 elements present; grammar flows naturally
- Partial ⚠️: 3-4 elements present; some flattening present
- Flattened ❌: 0-2 elements; mechanical/database language dominant
Feature Compliance Matrix
| Feature |
Entity |
Moment |
Place |
Lenses |
Situation |
Overall |
Priority |
| Morning Standup |
✅ |
✅ |
✅ |
✅ |
✅ |
Conscious |
Reference |
| Intent Classification |
✅ |
⚠️ |
❌ |
⚠️ |
✅ |
Partial |
High |
| Todo Management |
⚠️ |
❌ |
❌ |
❌ |
✅ |
Flattened |
High |
| Feedback System |
✅ |
⚠️ |
⚠️ |
❌ |
✅ |
Partial |
Medium |
| Slack Integration |
✅ |
⚠️ |
✅ |
⚠️ |
⚠️ |
Partial |
High |
| GitHub Integration |
✅ |
⚠️ |
⚠️ |
⚠️ |
⚠️ |
Partial |
High |
| Notion Integration |
✅ |
❌ |
❌ |
❌ |
⚠️ |
Flattened |
Medium |
| Calendar Integration |
✅ |
✅ |
⚠️ |
⚠️ |
⚠️ |
Partial |
Medium |
| Auth/Session Management |
✅ |
❌ |
❌ |
❌ |
⚠️ |
Flattened |
Low |
| Conversation Handler |
✅ |
⚠️ |
⚠️ |
⚠️ |
✅ |
Partial |
Medium |
| Onboarding System |
⚠️ |
✅ |
⚠️ |
✅ |
✅ |
Partial |
Medium |
| List Management |
⚠️ |
❌ |
❌ |
❌ |
✅ |
Flattened |
Low |
| Project Management |
⚠️ |
❌ |
❌ |
❌ |
✅ |
Flattened |
Low |
| File Management |
⚠️ |
❌ |
❌ |
❌ |
✅ |
Flattened |
Low |
| Personality System |
✅ |
⚠️ |
✅ |
⚠️ |
⚠️ |
Partial |
Medium |
| MCP Integration |
⚠️ |
❌ |
⚠️ |
⚠️ |
⚠️ |
Flattened |
Low |
Detailed Feature Analysis
1. Morning Standup ✅ CONSCIOUS (Reference Implementation)
File: services/features/morning_standup.py
Grammar Assessment:
- ✅ Entity:
StandupContext.user_id and workflow identity maintained throughout
- ✅ Moment: Yesterday/Today/Blockers categorization; present moment awareness (“Currently in: Meeting”)
- ✅ Place:
_get_github_activity(), generate_with_calendar(), generate_with_documents() show Place-aware gathering
- ✅ Lenses: Temporal perception (past/present/future); emotional intelligence (accomplishment levels)
- ✅ Situation: Contextual encouragement; morning vs evening tone adaptation; intelligent failure handling
Evidence: See dev/2026/01/19/p0-morning-standup-analysis.md for detailed analysis.
Key Patterns to Extract:
- Context/Result dataclass pair
- Parallel place gathering with synthesis
- Personality bridge for data transformation
- Warmth calibration
- Honest failure with suggestions
Recommendation: This is the reference architecture. Use as template for other features.
2. Intent Classification ⚠️ PARTIAL (High Priority)
File: services/intent_service/classifier.py
Grammar Assessment:
- ✅ Entity: User ID preserved; category/action mapped to user’s context
- ⚠️ Moment: Intent recognized, but treated as data classification not experiential recognition
- ❌ Place: No Place awareness; intent classification is context-agnostic
- ⚠️ Lenses: Classification confidence provides perception, but limited dimensionality
- ✅ Situation: Different responses for low-confidence vs high-confidence intents
Current Language: Mechanical/database-like
intent = Intent(
category=IntentCategory.EXECUTION,
action="complete_todo",
confidence=0.95
)
Grammar Deficits:
- No Place attribute (where is this intent being expressed?)
- No Moment framing (what temporal context triggers this?)
- Response is data, not experience
Transformation Potential: HIGH
- Could add Place awareness (Slack vs CLI vs web detection)
- Could frame intent as Moment of understanding (user’s intent is a moment Piper experiences)
- Response bridge could add warmth/encouragement
3. Todo Management ❌ FLATTENED (High Priority)
File: services/todo/todo_service.py
Grammar Assessment:
- ⚠️ Entity: User ID present but minimal self-reference
- ❌ Moment: Treated as persistent data, not scenes/occurrences
- ❌ Place: No Place awareness; todos are location-agnostic
- ❌ Lenses: Basic status tracking only; no perceptual dimensions
- ✅ Situation: Status-based behavior (open vs completed vs archived)
Current Language: Pure database
async def create_todo(
self,
title: str,
user_id: str,
status: TodoStatus = TodoStatus.OPEN,
priority: TodoPriority = TodoPriority.MEDIUM
) -> Todo:
Grammar Deficits:
- No connection to Experience or Moment
- No Place-specific behavior (Slack todo vs web todo feels same)
- No Piper personality or encouragement
Transformation Potential: HIGH
- Add Moment framing to todo lifecycle (creation moment, completion moment, blocker moment)
- Add Place-aware presentation (Slack format vs email vs web)
- Bridge for personality (celebrate completion; encourage on blocker)
- Context dataclass pair pattern applicable
4. Feedback System ⚠️ PARTIAL (Medium Priority)
File: services/feedback/feedback_service.py
Grammar Assessment:
- ✅ Entity: Feedback ownership tracked with session/user ID
- ⚠️ Moment: Capture timestamp, but not framed as significant moment
- ⚠️ Place: Session context captured, but not elevation to atmospheric Place
- ❌ Lenses: Minimal; just type/rating dimensions
- ✅ Situation: Different handling for bug vs feature vs UX feedback
Current Language: Mostly mechanical with some awareness
async def capture_feedback(
self,
session_id: str,
feedback_type: str, # "bug", "feature", "ux"
comment: str,
rating: Optional[int] = None
) -> str:
Grammar Deficits:
- Feedback is treated as data capture, not as a Moment of insight
- No Place atmosphere (where feedback was given affects meaning)
- Response doesn’t acknowledge the moment (no gratitude, no understanding)
Transformation Potential: MEDIUM
- Frame feedback capture as Moment Piper experiences user’s insight
- Add Place awareness (feedback in standup = different from feedback in todo)
- Add personality to acknowledgment
- Temporal lens (is this early feedback or after long use?)
5. Slack Integration ⚠️ PARTIAL (High Priority)
File: services/integrations/slack/slack_plugin.py
Grammar Assessment:
- ✅ Entity: Slack user/workspace identity maintained
- ⚠️ Moment: Message events captured, but as data not Experience
- ✅ Place: Slack IS a Place; channel-specific behavior present
- ⚠️ Lenses: Some spatial awareness; #channel vs DM context
- ⚠️ Situation: Different behavior for mentions vs commands vs background
Current Language: Plugin structure with limited personality
class SlackPlugin(PiperPlugin):
def __init__(self):
self.config_service = SlackConfigService()
self.integration_router = SlackIntegrationRouter(self.config_service)
Grammar Deficits:
- Responses feel templated, not personality-infused
- Channel atmosphere not really appreciated (public #channel response same tone as DM)
- No Moment framing (user is in middle of conversation; how should Piper enter?)
Transformation Potential: HIGH
- Add Slack-specific personality (casual, emoji-friendly, channel-aware)
- Moment bridge: Detect when user is seeking help vs exploring vs collaborating
- Place atmosphere: DM feels intimate; #channel feels professional
- Temporal lens: Time of day affects tone (morning standup mention vs late night)
6. GitHub Integration ⚠️ PARTIAL (High Priority)
File: services/integrations/github/github_plugin.py
Grammar Assessment:
- ✅ Entity: Repository/org identity; user as contributor maintained
- ⚠️ Moment: Events (push, PR, issue) captured as data, not Moments
- ⚠️ Place: GitHub IS a Place; but response is generic
- ⚠️ Lenses: Repository context provides some lens
- ⚠️ Situation: PR vs issue vs commit - different handling, but subtle
Current Language: Templated/mechanical
class GitHubPlugin(PiperPlugin):
def get_router(self) -> Optional[APIRouter]:
"""Return FastAPI router with GitHub routes."""
Grammar Deficits:
- GitHub activity is summarized as data, not as Moments the developer experienced
- No Moment narrative (what happened and why it matters to developer)
- Repository identity is Place, but atmosphere not adapted
- Urgency lens missing (is this a blocker? A nice-to-have review?)
Transformation Potential: HIGH
- Frame activity as developer’s Moments (you pushed code, created PR, got review)
- Add urgency/impact lens (blocked PR affects tempo differently than review comment)
- Adapt tone to repo culture (fast-moving startup vs established project)
- Synthesize into standup narrative
7. Notion Integration ❌ FLATTENED (Medium Priority)
File: services/integrations/notion/notion_plugin.py
Grammar Assessment:
- ✅ Entity: Document ownership preserved
- ❌ Moment: Document updates treated as data, not meaningful occurrences
- ❌ Place: Notion workspace is Place, but no atmosphere adaptation
- ❌ Lenses: Just content retrieval; no perceptual adaptation
- ⚠️ Situation: Some filtering by document type, but minimal
Current Language: Data retrieval
async def get_documents(self, workspace_id: str) -> List[Document]:
"""Fetch documents from Notion workspace."""
Grammar Deficits:
- Notion docs are treated as data sources, not Places or Moments
- No narrative about what changed or why it matters
- Response format is query result, not experience
Transformation Potential: MEDIUM
- Frame docs as Places (database = place to work; meeting notes = Place to remember)
- Change-tracking as Moments (you updated this doc)
- Add context about relevance (this doc mentions your current project)
- Synthesize into broader context awareness
8. Calendar Integration ⚠️ PARTIAL (Medium Priority)
File: services/integrations/calendar/calendar_integration.py
Grammar Assessment:
- ✅ Entity: Calendar owner identity maintained
- ✅ Moment: Events ARE Moments; temporal framing present (current meeting, upcoming events)
- ⚠️ Place: Calendar events have location, but not atmospherically adapted
- ⚠️ Lenses: Temporal lens strong; urgency/focus lenses partial
- ⚠️ Situation: Free time vs meeting time vs focus time - some situational awareness
Current Language: Temporal but mechanical
temporal_summary = {
"current_meeting": current_meeting,
"free_blocks": free_blocks,
"focus_time": focus_time
}
Grammar Deficits:
- Moment is recognized (current meeting) but presentation could be warmer
- Place (meeting location) recognized but atmosphere not adapted
- No Piper presence in the narrative (just facts)
Transformation Potential: MEDIUM
- Add empathy to current meeting awareness (“I see you’re in a meeting; I’ll wait”)
- Adapt response based on next event (running late? prepare for standup?)
- Multiple lenses: focus time affects response differently than free time
9. Auth/Session Management ❌ FLATTENED (Low Priority)
File: services/auth/auth_service.py
Grammar Assessment:
- ✅ Entity: User identity is core function
- ❌ Moment: Authentication is treated as security check, not Moment
- ❌ Place: No Place awareness in auth flow
- ❌ Lenses: Security-only dimension; no other perceptual lenses
- ⚠️ Situation: Different auth flows exist, but minimal situational variation
Current Language: Security/technical
async def authenticate_user(
self,
username: str,
password: str
) -> AuthToken:
"""Authenticate user and return token."""
Grammar Deficits:
- Auth is necessary but low-grammar component
- First login IS a Moment (onboarding opportunity), but not treated as such
- Session timeout could be graceful (acknowledged) vs harsh (denied)
Transformation Potential: LOW
- Reason: Auth is infrastructure-adjacent; grammar application limited
- Possible: Frame first login as Moment; acknowledge session end gracefully
- Not a priority for Phase 2 (focus on high-impact features first)
10. Conversation Handler ⚠️ PARTIAL (Medium Priority)
File: services/conversation/conversation_handler.py
Grammar Assessment:
- ✅ Entity: User/Piper conversation identity maintained
- ⚠️ Moment: Message turns treated as exchanges, some sequence awareness
- ⚠️ Place: Conversation context (onboarding vs standup vs general) partially tracked
- ⚠️ Lenses: Personality system provides some lenses; limited perceptual adaptation
- ✅ Situation: Different handlers for different conversation types (standup vs onboarding vs portfolio)
Current Language: Conversation-aware but mechanical
async def handle_message(
self,
conversation_id: str,
user_id: str,
message: str
) -> str:
Grammar Deficits:
- Conversation is fundamentally about Moments, but frames them mechanically
- No Place atmosphere adjustment (web vs Slack conversation different?)
- Response bridge not consistently applied
Transformation Potential: MEDIUM
- Frame each message as Moment of understanding/expression
- Add Place awareness (where is conversation happening?)
- Consistent personality bridge application
- Memory of conversation Moments (not just last message)
11. Onboarding System ⚠️ PARTIAL (Medium Priority)
File: services/onboarding/portfolio_onboarding_handler.py
Grammar Assessment:
- ⚠️ Entity: User identity present but Piper’s role unclear
- ✅ Moment: Onboarding IS Moments (first login, first integration, first success)
- ⚠️ Place: Recognizes web as entry Place but minimal atmosphere
- ✅ Lenses: Progressive disclosure uses perception (user’s readiness level)
- ✅ Situation: Context-dependent prompts; different paths for different states
Current Language: Structured but somewhat mechanical
async def process_portfolio_step(
self,
user_id: str,
step: str,
data: Dict[str, Any]
) -> PortfolioStep:
Grammar Deficits:
- Onboarding framing is prescriptive not collaborative
- Place (web onboarding) could feel warmer
- Piper’s encouragement not consistent
Transformation Potential: MEDIUM
- Frame onboarding as journey Piper guides user through (collaborative)
- Add warmth/encouragement at key Moments (first integration successful!)
- Place-specific messaging (welcoming tone for web)
- Celebrate progress points
12. List Management ❌ FLATTENED (Low Priority)
File: services/repositories/list_repository.py
Grammar Assessment:
- ⚠️ Entity: List ownership preserved
- ❌ Moment: Lists treated as persistent data structure
- ❌ Place: No Place awareness
- ❌ Lenses: No perceptual adaptation
- ✅ Situation: Minimal - different queries, same response format
Transformation Potential: LOW
- Reason: Lists are foundational data structures; low user-facing impact
- Possible: Treat list creation as Moment; adapt based on usage pattern
- Better focus: Uplift features that present to users first
13. Project Management ❌ FLATTENED (Low Priority)
File: services/repositories/project_repository.py
Grammar Assessment:
- ⚠️ Entity: Project ownership preserved
- ❌ Moment: Projects are data, not Experiences
- ❌ Place: No atmosphere adaptation
- ❌ Lenses: Basic filtering only
- ✅ Situation: Different queries exist but no situational response variation
Transformation Potential: LOW
- Reason: Behind other features; indirect user impact
- Better focus: Uplift features that present to users first
14. File Management ❌ FLATTENED (Low Priority)
File: services/repositories/file_repository.py
Grammar Assessment:
- ⚠️ Entity: File ownership preserved
- ❌ Moment: Files treated as data objects
- ❌ Place: No context/atmosphere
- ❌ Lenses: No perceptual dimensions
- ✅ Situation: Status-based queries only
Transformation Potential: LOW
- Reason: Low-level infrastructure; uplift user-facing features first
15. Personality System ⚠️ PARTIAL (Medium Priority)
File: services/personality/standup_bridge.py
Grammar Assessment:
- ✅ Entity: Piper’s personality as Entity
- ⚠️ Moment: Applies warmth calibration across Moments
- ✅ Place: Adapts tone based on Place (email vs chat)
- ⚠️ Lenses: Warmth/encouragement lenses; limited other dimensions
- ⚠️ Situation: Adjusts based on accomplishment level, but limited situational variation
Current Language: Personality-aware but targeted
accomplishment_prefixes = {
0.8: ["Outstanding work!", "Incredible progress!"],
0.6: ["Great job!", "Nice work!"],
0.4: ["Good progress!", "Moving forward!"],
}
Grammar Deficits:
- Excellent example of warmth calibration
- Could apply more broadly beyond standup
Transformation Potential: MEDIUM
- Extract personality patterns for reuse across all features
- Expand lenses beyond warmth (confidence, urgency, collaboration)
- Consistent application across all Piper responses
16. MCP Integration ❌ FLATTENED (Low Priority)
File: services/mcp/mcp_plugin.py
Grammar Assessment:
- ⚠️ Entity: External system identity preserved
- ❌ Moment: Tool invocations treated as API calls
- ⚠️ Place: Context passed but not atmospherically adapted
- ⚠️ Lenses: Tool capabilities create lens, but limited
- ⚠️ Situation: Tool selection based on context, but minimal variation
Transformation Potential: LOW
- Reason: Infrastructure-adjacent; limited user-facing impact
- Focus: Higher-priority features first
🔴 CRITICAL (High Priority) - Implement in Phase 2-3
Impact: High user-facing impact; moderate transformation complexity
- Intent Classification (⚠️ Partial → ✅ Conscious)
- User touches every interaction
- Clear grammar gaps: missing Place, Moment framing
- Reusable patterns: Context/Result pair, Moment bridge
- Slack Integration (⚠️ Partial → ✅ Conscious)
- Core communication channel; high usage
- Clear Place (Slack channel); needs Moment framing + Personality bridge
- High impact on user experience
- GitHub Integration (⚠️ Partial → ✅ Conscious)
- High-engagement developers
- Activity data ready to transform into Moment narrative
- Reusable: Activity→Moment framing
- Todo Management (❌ Flattened → ⚠️ Partial)
- Core feature; high usage
- Major transformation needed
- Pattern: Context/Result + Personality bridge
🟡 IMPORTANT (Medium Priority) - Implement in Phase 3-4
- Feedback System (⚠️ Partial → ✅ Conscious)
- Mid-frequency user interaction
- Moderate transformation (mostly personality + Moment framing)
- Good learning opportunity
- Conversation Handler (⚠️ Partial → ✅ Conscious)
- Foundational; affects all interactions
- Moderate complexity; good for pattern consolidation
- Enables better personality consistency
- Onboarding System (⚠️ Partial → ✅ Conscious)
- First-impression impact
- Transformation: collaborative framing + warmth calibration
- Learning opportunity: progressive disclosure + Situation awareness
- Calendar Integration (⚠️ Partial → ✅ Conscious)
- Contextual awareness is strong; Moment framing needed
- Good for multi-lens pattern (temporal + spatial + urgency)
- Personality System (⚠️ Partial → ✅ Conscious)
- Infrastructure; but enables above features
- Extract reusable patterns; expand lens dimensions
- Creates bridge for all features to use consistently
🟢 DEFERRED (Low Priority) - Implement in Phase 4+
- Auth/Session Management: Infrastructure-adjacent; limited grammar impact
- List/Project/File Management: Backend features; low direct user impact
- MCP Integration: Infrastructure-adjacent; limited user-facing impact
Key Patterns for Reuse
Based on audit and P0 analysis, these patterns are consistently needed:
Pattern: Context/Result Dataclass Pair
Applicable To: Intent, Todo, Feedback, Conversation, Onboarding, GitHub, Slack
@dataclass
class [Feature]Context:
"""Input context before processing"""
user_id: str # Entity
timestamp: datetime # Moment
source_places: Dict[str, Any] # Places
@dataclass
class [Feature]Result:
"""Output result after processing"""
user_id: str # Entity preserved
generated_at: datetime # Moment of result
findings: List[str] # What was learned
source_places: Dict[str, str] # Where data came from
Pattern: Place Gathering (Parallel)
Applicable To: Intent, Todo, Feedback, GitHub, Slack, Conversation
async def gather_context(self) -> Dict[str, Any]:
# Parallel fetch from Places
results = await asyncio.gather(
self._get_place_1_context(),
self._get_place_2_context(),
self._get_place_3_context(),
)
return self._synthesize(results)
Pattern: Personality Bridge
Applicable To: ALL features that present data to users
class [Feature]ToChatBridge:
def adapt_for_chat(self, raw_data: Dict) -> str:
"""Transform raw data to conversational format"""
def apply_personality(self, content: str, context: Dict) -> str:
"""Apply warmth, action orientation, presence"""
Pattern: Warmth Calibration
Applicable To: Todo, Feedback, Intent responses, Onboarding feedback
warmth_levels = {
0.8: ["Outstanding!", "Fantastic!", "Incredible!"], # High
0.6: ["Great!", "Nice work!", "Well done!"], # Medium
0.4: ["Good progress", "Moving forward"], # Neutral
0.2: ["Progress made", "Continuing on"], # Low
}
Pattern: Honest Failure with Suggestion
Applicable To: All integration features
except IntegrationError as e:
error_msg = f"[Feature] encountered: {str(e)}"
suggestion = self._diagnose_failure(e)
raise [Feature]Error(
f"{error_msg}\nSuggestion: {suggestion}",
suggestion=suggestion
)
Pattern: Moment Framing
Applicable To: All features
# Instead of:
"Query returned 5 items"
# Use:
"I noticed 5 items since your last review"
# or
"I found 5 items that might interest you"
# or
"5 important items need attention"
Recommendations by Feature
Intent Classification
Current: Mechanical classification
Goal: Conscious intent recognition
Approach:
- Add Place detection (Slack vs CLI vs web)
- Frame intent as Moment Piper experiences
- Apply Personality bridge to response
- Use warmth calibration for confidence-based responses
Estimated Effort: Medium (5-7 patterns to apply)
User Impact: High (all interactions begin with intent)
Slack Integration
Current: Templated responses
Goal: Channel-aware, personality-infused
Approach:
- Detect Channel atmosphere (public vs DM vs bot-mention)
- Frame messages as Moments user is experiencing
- Adapt personality to Slack culture (emoji, casual tone)
- Time-aware responses (morning standup mention vs random evening)
Estimated Effort: Medium (4-5 patterns)
User Impact: High (primary communication channel)
GitHub Integration
Current: Data summaries
Goal: Activity narrative
Approach:
- Frame commits/PRs/issues as developer Moments
- Add urgency lens (blocked vs review vs FYI)
- Adapt tone to repo culture
- Synthesize into standup context
Estimated Effort: Medium (5-6 patterns)
User Impact: High (developer engagement)
Todo Management
Current: Database operations
Goal: Conscious task management
Approach:
- Add Place awareness (Slack vs email vs web todo)
- Frame task lifecycle as Moments (creation, completion, blocking)
- Apply personality bridge with warmth calibration
- Context/Result pair for structured feedback
Estimated Effort: High (6-7 patterns, larger refactoring)
User Impact: Very High (core feature)
- Feature-Object Model Map:
docs/internal/architecture/current/feature-object-model-map.md - Per-feature mapping of Entities/Moments/Places with canonical queries
- ADR-055: Object Model Implementation (formalized grammar)
- MUX Implementation Guide:
docs/internal/development/mux-implementation-guide.md
- MUX Experience Tests:
docs/internal/development/mux-experience-tests.md
- Morning Standup Analysis:
dev/2026/01/19/p0-morning-standup-analysis.md
- B1 FTUX Grammar Mapping:
dev/2026/01/19/p0-b1-ftux-grammar-mapping.md
Next Steps
Phase 2 (Planned): Extract and formalize 5+ reusable patterns from Morning Standup into pattern catalog
Phase 3 (Planned): Create transformation guide with worked examples (Intent Classification recommended)
Phase Z (Planned): Update ADRs, create developer onboarding checklist, enable independent application
Appendix: Audit Evidence
Files Reviewed
Core Features:
services/features/morning_standup.py (reference)
services/intent_service/classifier.py (intent)
services/todo/todo_service.py (todo)
services/feedback/feedback_service.py (feedback)
Integrations:
services/integrations/slack/slack_plugin.py
services/integrations/github/github_plugin.py
services/integrations/notion/notion_plugin.py
services/integrations/calendar/calendar_integration.py
services/integrations/mcp/mcp_plugin.py
Infrastructure:
services/conversation/conversation_handler.py
services/onboarding/portfolio_onboarding_handler.py
services/auth/auth_service.py
services/personality/standup_bridge.py
services/repositories/list_repository.py
services/repositories/project_repository.py
services/repositories/file_repository.py
Analysis References
- P0 Morning Standup Analysis: 6 consciousness patterns identified
- P0 B1 FTUX Grammar Mapping: Grammar vocabulary present in existing specs
- MUX Infrastructure: 302 tests validating grammar compliance framework
Audit completed: 2026-01-20
Next review: Post-Phase 2 pattern extraction